發表文章

A Purely Model-Theoretic Analysis of Structural Collapse: Application of the Field-Theory Cultivation Framework

圖片
Abstract This paper presents a dimensionless, field-theory-inspired coherence model for analysing regime stability. Structural collapse is defined strictly as the irreversible crossing of a self-consistency threshold, formalised by the governing equation C = E + F + L − ( S + X ) C = E + F + L − ( S + X ) . The identical model is applied, without prediction or normative judgement, to the late-Soviet Union (1985–1991) and to contemporary China. The analysis isolates structural mechanisms through controlled counterfactual comparison. 1. Definition of the Collapse Field The collapse field is reached when structural self-consistency declines below the minimum level required to sustain simultaneous fiscal solvency, coercive capacity, baseline societal compliance, and external control: C ( t ) < C crit C ( t ) < C crit ​ Normalised balance-sheet formulation: C ( t ) = E ( t ) + F ( t ) + L ( t ) − ( S ( t ) + X ( t ) ) C ( t ) = E ( t ) + F ( t ) + L ( t ) − ( S ( t ) + X ( t ) ) with ...
張貼留言
閱讀完整內容

Quantum Cultivation Framework: A Field-Theoretic Interpretation of Power, Self-Cultivation, and Global Order

圖片
Introduction: The World as an Ocean of Interfering Fields Global dynamics may be understood as an ocean of interacting fields—states, institutions, economies, and individuals behaving as oscillatory systems within a larger structure. Stronger actors reshape rules, project influence across boundaries, and redefine equilibrium. Weaker actors focus on maintaining local stability, adapting to fluctuations rather than controlling them. In this analogy: Global order is a macroscopic field ocean. Personal cultivation is a microscopic excitation within that field. A successful individual maintains internal coherence while sensing macro-structural shifts, choosing when to resonate and when to avoid turbulence. A successful nation stabilizes its core structure while influencing surrounding systems across scales. Thus, personal development and international structure are expressions of the same theoretical framework—operating at different magnitudes. I. Ontology: Vacuum as the Dao In advance...
張貼留言
閱讀完整內容