Jensen Huang: The Visionary Engineer Who Transformed GPUs into the Engines of the AI Era

Jensen Huang: The Engineering Revolutionary from Graphics Chips to AI Engines


In an era where artificial intelligence has become the global focus of technology, Jensen Huang’s name is almost synonymous with NVIDIA GPUs. His vision and engineering leadership transformed GPUs into the core hardware of deep learning, fueling the explosive growth of modern machine learning.





1. Founding NVIDIA: The Beginning of the GPU Revolution



In 1993, Jensen Huang co-founded NVIDIA with his partners, initially focusing on graphics processing units (GPUs) for gaming and visual applications. With the rise of deep learning, he recognized GPUs’ inherent advantage in matrix computation and steered NVIDIA toward scientific computing and AI.





2. Building the CUDA Platform: Unlocking GPU Potential



In 2006, NVIDIA launched CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture), allowing developers to program GPUs using standard programming languages for non-graphical tasks. This platform became the foundation for AI engineers and researchers, turning GPUs into general-purpose accelerators.





3. Constructing an AI Ecosystem: Hardware, Software, and Platforms



Huang’s focus extended beyond chips themselves—he built an entire AI ecosystem comprising:


  • GPU Chips: A100, H100 — purpose-built for AI training and inference
  • AI Supercomputers: DGX systems — enabling large-scale model training
  • Software Stack: TensorRT, cuDNN, and other acceleration libraries
  • Cloud Platforms: NVIDIA AI Enterprise — supporting enterprise AI deployment



This integrated “hardware + software + platform” strategy made NVIDIA the infrastructure provider of the AI era.





4. Driving AI Adoption Through Cross-Sector Collaboration



Huang actively collaborates with academia and industry to accelerate AI applications across healthcare, autonomous driving, and language models. Leading organizations such as OpenAI, Meta, and Google all train their models using NVIDIA GPUs—demonstrating the company’s central role in AI development.





5. Receiving the QEPrize: Global Recognition of Engineering Excellence



In 2025, Jensen Huang and Bill Dally received the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering (QEPrize) alongside Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, John Hopfield, Yann LeCun, and Fei-Fei Li.

The official citation reads:


“The seven engineers made pioneering contributions to the three pillars of modern machine learning—algorithms, hardware, and data—enabling AI systems to process and learn from massive datasets, benefitting humanity worldwide.”



QEPrize Summary of Contributions


Laureate

Contribution Area

Summary

Bengio, LeCun, Hinton, Hopfield

Neural network algorithms

Established the theoretical foundation of deep learning and drove its practical implementation

Huang, Dally

Accelerated computing hardware

Transformed GPUs into AI training engines that power large-scale computation

Fei-Fei Li

Datasets and benchmarks

Created ImageNet, advancing computer vision and data-driven AI research

The 2025 QEPrize ceremony was held on November 5, 2025, at St. James’s Palace in London, and the awards were presented personally by King Charles III.





6. A Visionary and Industry Leader



Huang is more than an engineer—he’s a technological visionary. In 2025, he outlined ten major predictions for the future of AI, including the rise of generative AI, the evolution of AI chips, and the convergence of AI and robotics, influencing the strategic direction of the entire tech industry.





7. Legacy: Engineering as a Force for Humanity



Jensen Huang’s journey exemplifies how engineering innovation can change the world. He redefined the purpose of GPUs and laid the foundation for the AI era. His foresight and execution have turned engineering into a true driver of human progress.




Note:

The QEPrize (Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering) is one of the world’s most prestigious engineering awards—often called the “Nobel Prize of Engineering.” It is administered by the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Foundation and carries a prize of £500,000 (around NT$20 million). The 2025 theme, Modern Machine Learning, honors breakthroughs in the algorithms, hardware, and datasets that underpin AI.


2025 Laureates:


  • Yoshua Bengio
  • Geoffrey Hinton
  • John Hopfield
  • Yann LeCun
  • Jensen Huang
  • Bill Dally
  • Fei-Fei Li



Past QEPrize Winners (2013–2025):


  • 2025: Modern Machine Learning – Bengio, Hinton, Hopfield, LeCun, Huang, Dally, Li
  • 2024: Modern Wind Turbines – Andrew Garrad, Henrik Stiesdal
  • 2023: PERC Solar Cell – Martin Green, Andrew Blakers, Aihua Wang, Jianhua Zhao
  • 2022: NdFeB Permanent Magnets – Masato Sagawa
  • 2021: Blue LED – Isamu Akasaki, Shuji Nakamura, Nick Holonyak Jr, M. George Craford, Russell Dupuis
  • 2019: Global Positioning System (GPS) – Bradford Parkinson, James Spilker Jr, Hugo Fruehauf, Richard Schwartz
  • 2017: Digital Imaging Sensors (CMOS) – Eric Fossum, George Smith, Nobukazu Teranishi, Michael Tompsett
  • 2015: Controlled-Release Drug Delivery – Robert Langer
  • 2013: The Internet and World Wide Web – Robert Kahn, Vinton Cerf, Louis Pouzin, Marc Andreessen, Tim Berners-Lee



For more information, visit the official website: https://qeprize.org/



留言

張貼留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

量子之影：台灣QNF-3量子導航系統的崛起與其地緣政治影響

圖片
  量子之影：台灣QNF-3量子導航系統的崛起與其地緣政治影響 摘要 在2035年，全球局勢緊張之際，台灣的量子導航技術成為重塑國際權力格局的關鍵力量。本篇科幻論文式敘事，記錄了國家中山科學研究院（NCSIST）一個小型團隊秘密研發QNF-3系統的歷程。該系統整合原子干涉、量子隨機亂數生成（QRNG）與量子密鑰分發（QKD），超越傳統GPS依賴，在無GPS環境下實現厘米級定位精度。在「去中化」政策推動下，QNF-3促進技術自主，脫離中國大陸北斗導航網的影響，卻意外加劇美國對太平洋權力轉移的恐懼。通過歷史回顧與未來推測，本文探討技術細節、社會政治影響與倫理困境，揭示量子導航霸權的潛力。 引言：量子自主的誕生 台灣量子導航的開端可追溯至2020年代初，受美中貿易戰與兩岸緊張局勢驅動，台灣轉向技術自立。「去中化」（de-Sinicization）政策旨在減少中國大陸的政治、文化與經濟影響，強化本土認同與國際連結。該政策涵蓋教育改革（強調台灣史而非漢族歷史）與經濟脫鉤（降低對中供應鏈依賴），為量子研究奠定基礎。 2025年，聯合國宣布「國際量子科學與技術年」，台灣中央研究院在台北101舉辦量子燈光秀，象徵其量子領域崛起。然而，在台中龍井的中科院實驗室，一場秘密行動悄然展開。六人小組在廢棄倉庫中啟動「量子導航框架」（QNF）計畫，旨在解決GPS易受干擾的弱點。受英國2024年量子PNT試驗（5米/小時精度）的啟發，團隊以原子干涉為核心，採「務實工程導向」，從簡陋環境邁向技術突破。 方法：技術基礎與整合 原子干涉：QNF-3的核心 QNF-3的核心是基於Mach-Zehnder干涉儀（MZI）的原子干涉技術。利用磁光阱冷卻銣-87原子至微開爾文級，系統以π/2雷射脈衝分裂原子波包，沿不同路徑演化後再合併，產生干涉圖案。圖案反映環境變化，如加速度（相位差Δφ ∝ gT²，g為重力加速度，T為演化時間）或旋轉（薩格納克效應，Δφ = 4πΩA/λv，Ω為角速度，A為封閉面積，λ為德布羅意波長，v為原子速度）。 早期QNF-1原型受環境干擾（如颱風振動）影響，精度有限。至2028年，QNF-2採用多迴路設計，有效面積放大100倍，實現米級精度。量子陀螺儀測量角速度達10^{-10} rad/s，結合加速度計形成完整慣性導航，無懼電磁戰。 QRNG與QKD融...
閱讀完整內容

Time as a Negentropic Force: Spacetime Interactions and the Cosmic Creative Principle

圖片
Abstract This paper proposes that time, endowed with a negentropic property (𝑑𝒩/𝑑𝓉 ≥ 0), acts as a dynamic force counteracting entropy, promoting molecular and atomic ordering in the microscopic world, and driving the origin of life, artificial evolution, and business strategy. We introduce a “causal mechanics” framework, unifying time (𝓉), information (ℐ), and energy (ℰ), and extend it to incorporate space-time interactions, suggesting that the interplay of space and time may serve as a dual expression of the cosmic creative principle. By integrating general relativity’s space-time curvature (R) and quantum mechanics’ space-time fluctuations, we model how space-time dynamics enhance negentropy accumulation (𝒩). Experimental evidence from gravitational waves and quantum memory experiments supports this hypothesis. Applications in artificial evolution and business strategy are explored, with reflections on the metaphysical implications for consciousness and cosmic purpose. 1. Intr...
閱讀完整內容

政治制度的熵減分析：時間維度下的制度比較研究

摘要 本研究提出一個創新的理論框架，將熱力學中的熵減概念應用於政治制度分析。透過引入時間維度和熵減速率的概念，本文比較了專制獨裁與民主自由、共產主義與資本主義、左派與右派政治取向在實現社會秩序方面的差異。研究發現，不同政治制度呈現出不同的熵減模式：專制制度具有高速但不穩定的熵減特徵，民主制度展現緩慢但持續的熵減過程，而經濟制度則在效率與平等之間表現出不同的權衡取捨。本研究為理解政治制度的動態特性和長期可持續性提供了新的理論視角。 關鍵詞： 政治制度、熵減理論、時間維度、制度比較、社會秩序 1. 引言 政治制度作為社會組織的核心機制，其主要功能在於將混亂的社會狀態轉化為有序的治理結構。這一過程在本質上類似於物理學中的熵減現象。熵作為衡量系統無序程度的物理量，其減少意味著系統從混亂走向有序。在政治學領域，我們可以將社會的無序狀態（如政治動盪、經濟混亂、社會分化）視為高熵狀態，而穩定的政治秩序、有效的經濟運行和社會凝聚力則代表低熵狀態。 然而，根據熱力學第二定律，孤立系統的熵只能增加或保持不變，要實現熵減必須有外部能量輸入，且總熵（系統加環境）通常會增加。這一原理為我們理解政治制度的運作提供了新的視角：政治制度的熵減需要外部資源投入（如領導力、公民參與、經濟資源），並可能在其他方面產生熵增的代價。 本研究的創新之處在於引入時間維度，將熵減速率作為衡量政治制度效能的重要指標。熵減速率的物理維度為 [ 𝒯⁻¹ ] 或能量變化率 [𝑀 𝐿² 𝒯⁻² Θ⁻¹]，這使我們能夠量化不同政治制度實現秩序的速度和效率。 2. 理論框架 2.1 熵減的政治學詮釋 在政治學語境下，熵減可以從多個層面理解： 熱力學熵減 [𝑀 𝐿² 𝒯⁻² Θ⁻¹]：政治制度通過資源配置、政策實施等方式，將社會從無序狀態轉化為有序狀態，如平息動亂、統一政策、建立穩定的治理結構。 資訊熵減 [無量綱]：通過減少資訊的不確定性，如統一意識形態、建立透明的資訊流通機制、降低政治預期的不確定性 。 「無量綱」（dimensionless）簡單來說，就是一個量沒有物理單位，或者說它是純數值。 無量綱的量通常是比率、比例或對數的結果，這些計算會把單位「抵消」掉，留下純粹的數值。 無量綱的量（像資訊熵）不依賴物理單位，所以在不同系統（例如政治、經濟、資訊科技）中都能用，特別適合抽象的比較。  [𝑀 ?...
閱讀完整內容